DNR
Watch
Inside Governor Thompson's
DNR
The Natural Resource
Accountability Project
Research Report No. 1
August, 1998
Thompson Defends Fox River Polluters
Against Responsible Cleanup
Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusion
Recommendations
Conclusion
The DNR has been corrupted and deflected from its original purpose by
the influence of industry donations to Gov. Thompson's campaigns.
The DNR activities under Gov. Thompson have been severely constrained for
several years, preventing the agency from performing its basic function
of protecting public health, wildlife and natural resources.
This report provides a classic example of the importance of a strong
federal presence through programs like Superfund, and the need for a "legal
hammer" at the federal level to force polluters to the bargaining table.
Time after time, DNR staff have initiated efforts to promote more aggressive
clean-up or better public outreach, but they've been held back and forced
by the Governor to work within committee processes and agreements with
polluters which conflict with the DNR's function and basic duties.
At the same time,
Thompson has eliminated advocates for cleanup, like Thomas Dawson,
of the Wisconsin Public Intervenor Office.
Gov. Thompson is not serving the public interest on the Fox River.
Recommendations
Restore the political independence of the DNR by making the DNR Secretary
a position which answers to a seven member Natural Resources Board consisting
of citizens appointed by the Governor and Legislature, serving staggered
6-year terms.
Restore the Wisconsin Public Intervenor Office to watchdog actions of
government agencies, and intervene, if necessary, to protect public
rights in natural resources.
Reform campaign financing to provide only public funding and eliminate
donations from private special interests.
Strengthen enforcement and funding of Wisconsin's sediment cleanup
programs, following these principles:
The polluters must provide upfront funds to characterize contaminated
sites and study cleanup options. These funds and studies must be
under the direct control of the DNR staff, not the polluters.
The polluters must pay the full cost of studies and cleanup, not taxpayers.
Site studies and cleanup must be timely, not delayed over several years.
Remedies must protect public and wildlife health.
Remedies must include permanent solutions, such as detoxification treatments,
not simply dig and dump landfilling, creating potential problems elsewhere.
Conflicts of interest between the polluters and cleanup consultants
must be strictly prohibited.
Maintain and strengthen federal programs, including Superfund and NRDA,
to ensure rapid cleanup of contaminated sites in cases where the state
or local governments have failed to act.
Report Sections
The Purpose of this
Report
Twelve Years of Delay
- A Fox River Clean-up Timeline
Deals, Consultants,
Paper Industry Allies, and Tourism
The Health Risks
of PCBs and Landfilling Contaminated Sludge
Legislative Connections,
Paper Company Economics, and Industry Control of the Process
The Fed's Step In
Conclusions and Recommendations
The Paper Money
Trail - Political Campaign Contributions to the Governor
DNR Report Study
Methods
References
|