

|
The Job Creation Act of
2003 /2004
degrades our environment, economy
and democracy in Wisconsin

News Opinion Articles: No
special interest left behind and Do
business tax breaks do any good? and other
articles.
| As if the other
deregulatory bills weren't bad enough, the Republicans of the Wisconsin
Legislature have launched an additional all-out attack on Wisconsin's environment
--- a large package of proposed changes under the misleading title "Job
Creation Act," otherwise known as Senate Bill 313 and Assembly Bill
655.
STATUS: On
January 9, the Republican sponsors and Governor Doyle agreed on a compromised
bill, which was approved by the State Assembly on Tuesday, January 13 with
a vote of 80 to 14 (see roll
call). It passed the State Senate on Tuesday, January 20 with
a vote of 27 to 6. (see roll
call). A draft of the new bill wasn't available until
Monday afternoon, January 12 and no public hearings were held on the compromise.
The Governor still
insists the bill will not lower air or water standards, which he knows
to be untrue. |
Protest at Gov. Doyle's Town Hall Meeting in Green
Bay
(1/16/04). Photo by H. Marc Larsen, reprinted
with
permission from the Green Bay News Chronicle
|
* Governor Doyle
signed
the "jobs" bill into law on Thursday, January
22, in DePere, at the International Paper Company (which busted its union
about 15 years ago after a strike that cost over 200 workers their union
jobs. Ahh, the irony...)
This compromise was the result of secret negotiations
which often included lobbyists from the special interest groups who will
benefit from this bill. DNR staff, the Attorney General, and environmentalists
were shut out of these negotiations. Clean Water Action Council
has asked the Attorney General's Office to investigate and prosecute the
parties as violators of Wisconsin's Open Meetings Law. (The AG has
already ruled that the original bill drafting process violated Wisconsin's
Open Records Law and has launched an investigation, but so far is not prosecuting.)
This compromised version of the bill would still be damaging to Wisconsin
air quality and waterways.
-
Click
Here for the latest draft of the bill,
as of Monday, January 12
The Republicans are manipulating public job fears in an effort to dismantle
essential protections for public health, wildlife, and our basic quality
of life in Wisconsin. Hunting, fishing, boating and other outdoor
recreation opportunities will be affected, the tourism industry will be
damaged, and the public's right to participate in key community decisions
will be curtailed.
Problems
with the Compromise
The following organizations have reviewed the
newest
version of the Job Creation Act, highlighting changes and calling attention
to serious problems:
Recent News
Coverage of the Compromise:
Actions
by Clean Water Action Council:
*The following
are provisions of the Old Version of the
bill, which
aren't very different from the
new version:
Key Objections to the "Job Creation Act"
Increased Pollution and Destruction of Natural Areas - This bill
attempts to change and or give away our water resources by changing the
laws under chapter 30 of Wisconsin's statutes. Chapter 30 defines the minimum
efforts that must be made by a public land owner in protection of the public’s
rights. In Wisconsin, we have a constitutional right to hunt and fish.
We have the right to enjoy the scenic beauty and the many benefits of lakes
and rivers of our state. Because even small private actions can and
will effect these rights over the long run, through accumulated impacts,
Chapters 30 and 31 were adopted to define the line between appropriate
and inappropriate behavior. This "Job Creation Act" would completely redefine
the minimum standards and harm the environment and the public’s rights.
Examples of the Act's effects, which would be allowed on roughly 80% of
the state’s waters, are as follows:
-
would eliminate the criminal enforcement provision in Chapter 30
-
would allow increased polluted runoff (non-point pollution), one
of the most serious forms of water pollution yet to be addressed adequately
in Wisconsin.
-
would create general permits for activities that degrade waterways
that previously required case-by-case permits. These general permits will
allow for blanket approval of activities along waterways, such as bridge
construction, grading of stream banks, placement of culverts, straightening
waterways, and even diverting sections of streams. The public could
comment on general permit activities only after the activity is approved
and underway.
|
General permits would allow projects like this.
|
-
would allow trout and smallmouth bass streams to be dredged, diverted,
lined with riprap, have culverts placed in them, have bridges put over
them without any public comment or DNR oversight. It would allow
bridges to be placed every six feet down the first 100 miles of the Wisconsin
River, if someone wanted to do this. Streamside landowners could
redirect or straighten 500 feet of your favorite trout stream. Headwaters
of rivers are particularly threatened, and more than 1600 miles of class
3 trout waters.
-
would allow destructive, degrading lakeshore development on larger lakes
including the construction of large piers, permanent boat shelters, dredging
of up to 200 dump truck loads of lakebed material, all without any public
comment or DNR oversight.
-
West Shore Green Bay: This entire area is a wetland complex
with critical northern pike spawning habitat. During spring flooding, pike
migrate along intermittent streams and roadside ditches to spawn. Unregulated
culvert construction, channelization, riprapping, dredging and filling
will block migrations and collapse fish populations.
-
would prevent Wisconsin from reducing mercury emissions, or other toxic
pollutants. The Act would prevent new regulations by subjecting them
to a strict cost-benefit test. The problem with this approach is illustrated
by the press release from Senator Panzer and Speaker Gard (on November
11) claiming the proposed mercury rules have 'high costs and little benefit.'
As the League of Conservation Voters points out, "The fact that lowering
mercury reduces damage to children's mental and physical development, and
reduces learning disabilities is difficult to quantify, but that does not
mean these changes are of little benefit. If this is the leadership's concept
of cost benefit analysis, we should drive a stake through its heart right
here, right now."
The Act is Anti-Democratic --- It would severely reduce the rights
of individuals to challenge business expansions in locations that would
affect their lives or the environment. The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign
(WDC) is calling this the "Public
Suppression Act of 2003." It would limit the ability
of the public to have a hearing on a major development of a protected water
resource. It would limit the ability of administrative law
judges to make rulings to protect threatened resources. It would also shorten
the time that the public would be able to comment on a development proposal
- if the public is even allowed to comment at all. (These comment
periods are often too short to begin with...) According to Mike McCabe
of WDC, "The bill severely limits public input on business permits. It
puts a muzzle on citizens and places blind faith in the good will of megacorporations.
It treats democracy as the enemy of the economy."
The Act Will Destroy, Not Create Jobs --- The Act's supporters
make the unsubstantiated claim that Wisconsin loses jobs because of its
onerous regulatory climate. Yet, studies show that environmental
permit regulation is NOT an important factor for businesses when it comes
to relocating or expanding in Wisconsin. For example, a study
done by UW business professor Dr. Jon Udell showed that top executives
in manufacturing rank Wisconsin highly as a location for manufacturers
in part because of our high quality water and recreational opportunities.
As Midwest Environmental Advocates (MEA) pointed out, in Udell's survey
"270 Wisconsin manufacturing executives (providing 24% of the state’s manufacturing
jobs) gave an above average ranking to the attitude of Wisconsin government
toward business (which includes regulations and legislation). The only
areas where Wisconsin ranked below average were taxes and labor relations.
Neither of these issues are addressed in the so called “Job Creation Act.”
In fact, MEA discovered that Republican sponsors of the Act had no data
to prove their basic claim that environmental regulations are costing jobs
in Wisconsin. Numerous other
studies show that environmental protection is good for the
economy.
This Act will not change the fact that the entire United States is currently
suffering manufacturing job losses because of free trade rules with undemocratic
and struggling economies in third world countries. U.S. workers can't
compete with slave wages and low benefits elsewhere. The Legislators
need to address these root causes of Wisconsin's manufacturing job losses,
not dismantle our health and environmental regulations.
The Milwaukee County Labor Council, AFL-CIO has gone on record
saying "We need real job creation. Republican State Senate and Assembly
members have proposed a cynical 'Job Creation Act' that would severely
undermine environmental regulations, plus make other changes to Wisconsin
laws that have nothing to do with job creation. One of the provisions
of this bill would prevent the Dept. of Workforce Development from setting
standards for the number of apprentices on job sites. This actually
destroys career ladders to family-supporting jobs. There is nothing
in this bill that will create jobs! The bill makes no mention
of critical job creation strategies such as targeted investment; worker
education and training; and accountability standards for the use of public
dollars as economic development incentives."
Rushed to Avoid Scrutiny --- Legislators tried to push the "Job
Creation Act" through the legislative process in just 3 days, to catch
everyone off guard. It was drafted behind closed doors, essentially
written by corporate lobbyists, and serves those corporate interests at
the expense of the public.
The Act is complicated and 114 pages in length, yet it was introduced
Tuesday afternoon, November 11, 2003, and scheduled for public hearing
on Wednesday morning, November 12, 2003 before the Legislature’s Joint
Finance committee, with the intent to have the full Legislature hold a
final vote by Friday of the same week. Such deliberate sneakiness
should not be tolerated in public officials who are supposed to be responsive
and concerned with the interests of the public. Wisconsin citizens
should be outraged. The Republicans have now been forced to slow
the process and promise public hearings, in response to the immediate anger
generated by their rush, but this conflict should not have been necessary
if the bill sponsors had acted respectfully toward the public.
Written by Corporate Lobbyists --- Lawyers for Wisconsin
Manufacturers and Commerce (the statewide version of the Chamber
of Commerce) and the Wisconsin Builders Association were heavily involved
in drafting the bill, which would dramatically ease regulations on their
industries.
| Numerous private meetings and communications occurred between these
business interests, legislators and the Legislative Reference Bureau which
writes the legal language for proposed bills. No environmentalists
had input. Of course, when the proposed Act became public, Wisconsin
Manufacturers and Commerce immediately praised it and helped with the campaign
for passage, orchestrated in cooperation with the Republican leadership.
According to a revealing
article in the Capitol Times, "When Senators Panzer and
Gard rolled out the bill at a news conference, media offices immediately
received a flurry of faxes from a variety of Wisconsin industry and trade
organizations, ranging from road builders to utilities, all endorsing the
bill and urging its adoption. Though each had a different letterhead, they
were all sent at the same time from the Madison headquarters of Wisconsin
Manufacturers & Commerce." |
Do we want Wisconsin's lakeshores and streambanks
to be bulldozed like this and turned into lawns?
|
The new legislative committee created to oversee Job Creation is chaired
by Republican Rep. Stepp, from Racine. At the November 25th public
hearing, she stated twice that she sympathized with the concerns of developers,
because she is a homebuilder and understands the business (not "was,"
but "is.") This means she will personally benefit financially
from the very legislation that she is promoting so vigorously, an obvious
ethical breach and conflict of interest. Throughout the hearing,
she repeatedly claimed to be environmentally concerned (as did all the
Republicans) and insisted (as did all the Republicans) that the Job Creation
Act would not lower Wisconsin's environmental standards, despite the extensive
evidence provided to the contrary. It was just like talking to a
wall.
Paid for by Corporate Lobbyists --- The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign
has released a scathing
critique of the anti-democratic aspects of the Act, including data
showing the huge campaign contributions received by Republican sponsors.
Special interests behind the bill have contributed nearly $7 million to
members of the Legislature since 1993. The lead "authors" of the
bill, Assembly Speaker John Gard and Senate Majority Leader Mary Panzer,
have accepted a total of $293,010 in campaign contributions from the interests
they let write the measure (from business, manufacturing, bankers, the
construction and road building industries, utilities, Realtors and papermakers,
among others.) This year alone, the legislative campaign committees that
Gard and Panzer control have collected $58,600 in contributions from these
interests.
As Steve Hiniker, of 1000 Friends of Wisconsin testified, “In short,
this legislation is a radical departure from the state’s long standing
tradition of involving the public in resource management. Wisconsin is
a national tourism destination because we have beautiful waters and outstanding
recreational opportunities. Wisconsin is in danger of losing that distinction
because of this legislation which was written in secret with development
interests who simply don’t care what our state looks like.” [emphasis
added]

Further Information
-
Environmental Economics --- Learn how backward
these proposals really are. Environmental regulations help support
our longterm economy.
-
Bill Text --- Read the exact
language of the Job Creation Act (old version).
-
Legislative
Sponsors --- Introduced by Senators PANZER,
STEPP, KANAVAS, KEDZIE, LEIBHAM, ZIEN, DARLING, ROESSLER
and WELCH --- Cosponsored by Representatives GARD, KAUFERT,
JOHNSRUD, GROTHMAN,
MONTGOMERY, SUDER, KESTELL, NASS, J.
FITZGERALD, TOWNS, FREESE, NISCHKE, HONADEL, MCCORMICK, D. MEYER,
KRAWCZYK,
KREIBICH, OWENS, J. WOOD, OTT, TOWNSEND, HUEBSCH, GIELOW,
JESKEWITZ and GUNDERSON.
(Northeast Wisconsin sponsors are highlighted
in bold letters.)
Selected Media Coverage of the Job Creation Act
-
Lobbyists
craft bill: Special interest hand heavy in regulatory rollback legislation,
11/14/03, CapTimes
-
Editorial:
GOP trying to ruin state, 11/14/03, CapTimes
-
Doyle,
GOP bicker over job creation bill: Gov wants faster action, 11/14/03,
CapTimes
-
Legislature
will return in early December, 11/14/03, GBNewsChronicle
-
Editorial:
Economic session chance for redemption, 11/14/03, AppletonPC
-
Governor, Legislature
trade jabs on jobs bills' delay, 11/13/03, MilwJS
-
Environmentalists
decry GOP's Job Creation Act, 11/13//03, CapTimes
-
Rollback
on Rules, 11/12/03, CapTimes
-
Rep. Gard:
Democrats Throw Up Jobs Bills Roadblock, 11/12/03, WisPolitics
-
Editorial:
No three-day wonders, 11/11/03, MilwJS
-
Lawmakers
seek to ease regulatory process, 11/11/03, MilwJS
-
GOP Introduces
Job Creation Act, Hopes for Quick Passage, 11/11/03, WisPolitics
Testimony and News Releases regarding the "Job Creation
Act"
back to top |